DEVELOPMENT SA
Short Answer Questions (SA) 3 Marks
Question
18.
Why
do we use averages? Are there any limitations to their use? Illustrate with
your own examples related to development. (NCERT Question)
Answer:
1. Total income is not a useful measure
for comparison between countries. Since countries have different populations,
comparing total income does not tell what an average person is likely to earn.
Hence, we use average income which is total income of the country divided by
total population.
2. The defect of average as a measure is
that it does not show the distribution (dispersion) of income between the rich
and the poor.
3. Two countries may have the same average
income but in one country almost every family may enjoy more or less the same
kind of income, whereas in the other, some may be very rich and others very
poor. The disparity between rich and poor is an important feature that the
average measure (per capita income) does not consider.
Example:
In terms of development, we can take the example of India, where the metro
towns are full of high-rise buildings and shopping malls while some villages have
not yet been provided with a basic necessity like electricity.
Question
19.
What
is per capita income? Mention any two limitations of per capita income as an
indicator of development. (2012)
Answer:
The
total income of a country divided by its total population gives the Per Capita
Income.
Money
cannot buy all the goods and services that are needed to live well. So income
by itself is not a completely adequate indicator of material goods and services
that citizens are able to use. For example, money can not buy a pollution-free
environment or ensure that one gets unadulterated medicines, unless one can
afford to shift to a community that already has all these things.
Question
20.
Kerala,
with lower per capita income, has a better human development ranking than
Punjab. Hence, per capita income is not a useful criterion at all and should
not be used to compare States. Do you agree? Discuss. NCERT Question
Answer:
Per
capita income is not a useful criterion at all to measure the human development
ranking of a state. High per capita income is not the only attribute to a good
quality life. Money cannot buy all the essential things required for a good
life. Pollution-free atmosphere to ensure good health, protection from
infectious diseases, lowering of mortality rate, promotion of literacy, etc.
are essential for a good standard of living. In order to achieve these, joint
efforts have to be made by all members of a community, be it rich or poor.
Kerala
ranks higher compared to Punjab even with a lower per capita income because—
1. mortality rate is lower
2. literacy rate is higher and
3. total number of children attending
school (Classes I-V) is higher.
Question
21.
On
the basis of which three indicators of HDI 2004 Sri Lanka has better rank than
India? (2014)
Answer:
Three
indicators of HDI 2004 in which Sri Lanka has better rank than India:
1. Per capita income—The per capita
income of Sri Lanka in US dollars was 4,390 US dollars while that of India was
3,139 US dollars.
2. Life expectancy at birth—The life
expectancy at birth for Sri Lanka was 74, higher than that of India at 64.
3. Gross enrolment ratio for three
levels—Sri Lanka had Gross Enrolment ratio of 69 while that of India was 60.
Question
22.
‘Conflicting
goals can also be developmental goals’. Elaborate with examples. (2014)
Answer:
All
persons do not have the same notion of development or progress. Each one of
them seeks different things. The seek things that are most important for them,
i.e., that which can fulfil their aspirations or desires. In fact at times two
persons or groups of persons may seek things which are conflicting.
A
girl expects as much freedom and opportunity as her brother and that he also
shares in the household work. Her brother may not like this.
To
get more electricity, industrialists may want more dams. But this may submerge
the land and disrupt the lives of people who are displaced, such as tribals.
They might resent this and may prefer small check dams or tanks to irrigate
their land.
Question
23.
What
are common developmental goals? Give any two suitable examples of common
developmental goals. (2015)
Answer:
There
are certain goals which are the same or common for all. These are common
developmental goals. The developmental goals that people have are not only about
better income but also about other important things in life. More income or
more material goods do not always give us a good quality life.
There
are other aspects such as equal treatment, freedom, security, opportunity to
learn, good working conditions, pollution-free atmosphere, job security and
good social life which are very important for a good quality life. Money or
material things that one can buy with it, is one factor on which our life
depends. But quality of our life also depends on non-material things, for
example, the role of our friends in our life which cannot be measured but mean
a lot to us.
Question
24.
“Money
cannot buy all the goods and services that one needs to live well” Do you agree
with this statement? Justify your answer with any three suitable arguments.
(2015)
Answer:
Yes,
I agree with the statement because money income and material goods alone are
not an adequate indicator of a good quality of life. Money cannot buy all the
goods and services one needs to live well.
• Money cannot buy a pollution free and
dean environment with fresh air.
• It cannot protect us from infectious
diseases and guarantee good health for us.
• Money cannot assure that medicines
available in the market are not adulterated.
To
live well one needs non-material factors such as equal treatment, freedom,
security, equal opportunity to learn, a pollution free environment, good and
safe working conditions etc.
Question
25.
Apart
from income, which other six things people look for as important aspects of our
lives? (2014, 2012)
Answer:
High
per capita income is not the only attribute to a good quality life. Money
cannot buy all the essential things required for a good life. Pollution-free
atmosphere to ensure good health, protection from infectious diseases, lowering
of mortality rate, promotion of literacy, job security, good working
conditions, etc. are essential for a good standard of living.
Question
26.
One
what basis the rich and low income countries have been categorized in the
world? What are the limitations of this approach? According to the World
Development Report, 2006, India comes in which category? Give reason for the
same. (2015, 2014)
Answer:
The
World Bank uses average income or per capita income as a criterion for
classifying different countries. Countries with per capita income of ?4,53,000
per annum and above (in the year 2004) are called rich countries and those with
per capita income of ?37,000 or less are called low income countries (India
comes under low income countries; the per capita income in India is ?28,000 per
annum). Those falling in between ₹37,000 – ₹4,53,000 are
placed in the middle category.
Limitations
of this criterion.
1. While averages are useful for
comparison, they also hide disparities. Two countries may have identical
average income, but one country may have equitable distribution where people
are neither very rich nor very poor, while in the other country most citizens
are very poor and very few are extremely rich,
2. Better income cannot ensure a good
quality life. Criterion set by the World Bank has ignored certain attributes of
a good life which do not depend on income or cannot be . bought with money.
Example,
freedom, equal treatment, equal opportunities, free atmosphere, provision of
unadulterated medicines, etc.
Question
27.
Why
do people look at a mix of goals for development? Explain.
Answer:
Though
income is one of the most important components of development, but there are
other important goals which people look at for development—
1. People also seek things like equal
treatment, freedom, security and respect.
2. Women need a safe and secure
environment to take up a variety of jobs or to run businesses as entrepreneurs.
3. People seek a pollution free
environment.
4. Students seek better education and
equal opportunities to learn.
Comments
Post a Comment